FOLLOW US
Ever dreamed of owning a house by the water where you can walk out to the shore and enjoy unrestricted access to the sea or lake? If so, you’ve brushed against the concept of water rights, a set of property rights that often play a crucial role in waterfront real estate.
Whether studying for a real estate exam or just diving into property law, understanding littoral rights is essential. This article will break down what these rights entail, how they differ across regions, and why they matter to waterfront property owners and agents alike.
Littoral rights refer to the set of rights of property owners whose land borders large, stationary bodies of water such as a pond , lake, or ocean. These rights ensure that property owners have access to and can make reasonable use of the water resources while owning the land up to the high-water mark.
Also these rights are appurtenant, meaning they are tied to the land itself and transferred with the property when it is sold.
Consider a beachfront property owner named Sarah. Her rights guarantee her the unobstructed use of the beach for her personal purposes up to the high water mark. Anything further, the property is public, so Sarah can not stop people from walking along the shoreline.
Not sure if you should get into a training program for the licensing exam? You can have a taste of what Lexawise can do for you.
The high-water mark is a critical boundary in real estate law, especially for waterfront properties. It represents the highest point water reaches under normal conditions and helps define where private ownership ends and public land begins.
Owners can use the area up to this point. However, the land beyond it usually belongs to the public. This land may be underwater during high tides or floods.
Littoral land is the actual land adjacent to a significant body of water, while littoral rights refer to the entitlements associated with the use of this land. These rights give property owners significant benefits, such as free access to the water for enjoyment and recreation.
Water rights are managed very differently in the United States between the East and West. This difference often has implications for the interpretation and application of littoral rights and other water rights.
Example: Using water from an adjacent lake for personal irrigation or livestock watering is considered reasonable under the riparian doctrine as long as it does not harm other users.
Understanding the differences between littoral and riparian rights can be pivotal in real estate practice. Both terms relate to water access, but they refer to different types of water bodies. They also have different effects on property owners.
Discover more about riparian rights vs. littoral rights in real estate!
This is incorrect. Littoral rights allow access to the land up to the high-water mark. However, the water itself is usually public. Property owners cannot stop others from using the water.
Littoral rights provide property owners bordering large bodies of water with essential access and usage rights up to the high-water mark. Unlike riparian rights, which apply to flowing water, littoral rights focus on still bodies like lakes and seas.
The rules and management can differ between eastern and western states. However, these rights are still important in real estate deals and property law. Understanding them is vital for professionals and students preparing for licensing exams.
Ready to deepen your understanding and excel in your real estate exam? Explore Lexawise’s exam prep tools for comprehensive study resources that ensure success on your first try.
Get 100 FREE practice questions and unlock an exclusive discount on our top-rated exam prep – your first step to passing with confidence!