
FOLLOW US
Real estate transactions involve various types of listing agreements, each with its own set of advantages and risks. Among these is the net listing in real estate, a rare and often misunderstood method that can dramatically affect both the seller’s profits and the agent’s commission. In this post, we’ll break down what they are in real estate, why it’s controversial, and what you need to know before considering this option.
What the seller is ultimately transferring through any listing agreement, including a net listing, is the full bundle of rights: possession, control, enjoyment, exclusion, and disposition. The net listing determines how the agent is compensated for facilitating that transfer, but it doesn’t change what’s being sold. Understanding that the listing agreement is about COMPENSATION, not about the property rights themselves, helps you answer exam questions that try to confuse the two.
A net listing is a pretty rare and often controversial type of real estate listing agreement where the seller sets a minimum acceptable price for their property, and the real estate agent’s commission is any amount above that price.
This arrangement differs from traditional listing agreements, where the agent earns a percentage of the final sale price as their commission. While it might seem straightforward, they pose significant risks for sellers and create potential conflicts of interest for agents.
However, it’s important to note that while net listings can sometimes lead to large commissions for agents, there’s also a risk that the agent may earn very little or even nothing, depending on the market. This creates uncertainty for both the seller and the agent.
In a net listing, the seller and agent agree on a net price—the minimum amount the seller wants from the sale. The agent is then free to sell the property for as much as possible, keeping any amount above the net price as their commission.

Want to test your knowledge before committing? Try a free practice exam and see how Lexawise works
To illustrate, imagine a homeowner agrees to a net listing with an agent. The homeowner sets a net price of $200,000 for their home. The agent managed to sell the home for $270,000. Under the net listing agreement, the agent would keep the $70,000 difference as their commission, which sounds like a terrific deal for the agent because it is significantly higher than the typical 5-6% commission ($13,500-$16,200) he would have earned in a traditional listing agreement.
While this might seem like an excellent deal for the agent, it can leave the seller feeling shortchanged, especially if they were unaware of the actual market value of their property.
On the flip side, if the market is slow and the agent can only sell the property for $255,000, they would only make $5,000—far less than they might have earned in a traditional commission structure.
Once the agent finds a buyer and an offer is accepted, the purchase agreement must clearly state the total sale price, not just the seller’s net amount. The earnest money deposit is based on the full sale price, not the net price. If the deal falls through, the seller’s net price and the agent’s commission above it may both be affected by how the earnest money refund clause is structured.
In some cases, the agent may struggle to sell the property at all, resulting in no earnings despite their efforts. Net listing legality varies dramatically by state — Michigan prohibits them entirely, while Wisconsin allows them with disclosure requirements. The free Michigan real estate practice exam tests why net listings create a conflict of interest, and the free Wisconsin real estate practice exam covers the disclosure rules that apply when they’re used.
Net listings are not only controversial but also considered unethical by many real estate professionals. The primary danger lies in the potential conflict of interest they create. Since the agent’s commission is directly tied to how much they can sell the property above the net price, there’s a risk that the agent may not act in the seller’s best interest. For example, an agent might pressure a seller to agree to a lower net price to increase their own commission.
Another significant risk is the lack of transparency. Sellers might not fully understand how much their property is worth, which could lead to them setting a net price that is too low. Unscrupulous agents could exploit this by selling the property at a higher price and pocketing a substantial commission.
Net listing conflicts become even more complex in properties with deed restrictions. If a property has HOA covenants that limit its use, restricting rentals, commercial activity, or modifications — the agent may know these restrictions reduce the property’s market value below what the seller expects. In a net listing, the agent benefits from a lower seller expectation (bigger surplus = bigger commission), creating a perverse incentive to downplay the impact of deed restrictions rather than disclose them fully.
Due to these risks, net listings are illegal in most states. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) explicitly forbids its members from engaging in net listings. In the few states where they are legal, such as California, Texas, and Florida, there are strict regulations in place to protect sellers. For example, in Texas, a net listing is only allowed if the seller explicitly requests it and fully understands the property’s market value.
In California, net listings are only recommended for highly sophisticated clients or clients who are independently represented and are well-versed in real estate investment and laws, allowing them to protect their interests. Even in these states, real estate professionals generally advise against using this listing agreement due to the potential for abuse.
In states where net listings are legal, they must comply with the statute of frauds, meaning the agreement must be in writing, signed by the seller, and clearly state the seller’s minimum net price. A verbal net listing agreement is unenforceable in every jurisdiction. Given the conflict-of-interest concerns, having the terms in writing is even more critical for net listings than for standard listing agreements. In states like North Carolina, net listings are prohibited outright, but the concept still appears on the exam. The North Carolina real estate salesperson exam tests what a net listing is and why the state bans it.

National Association of Realtors (NAR): Lawsuit Update
Given the risks associated with net listings, sellers should consider safer and more transparent alternatives:
This is the most common type of listing agreement. The seller works exclusively with one agent who has the right to market and sell the property. The agent earns a commission based on a percentage of the final sale price, even if the final buyer was attracted by the seller. This arrangement ensures that both the seller and the agent have aligned interests, as both benefit from securing the highest possible sale price.
In this type of listing agreement, the seller also works with one agent, but if the seller finds a buyer independently, they are not obligated to pay the agent a commission. This option offers more flexibility for sellers while still allowing them to benefit from the agent’s expertise.
An exclusive agency listing is the most common alternative to a net listing, where one broker has the exclusive right to market the property, but the seller retains the right to sell independently without paying a commission. Unlike a net listing, the exclusive agency agreement uses a fixed commission rate (typically 5-6%), which eliminates the conflict of interest that makes net listings controversial. The exam frequently tests the differences between net listings, exclusive agency, exclusive right to sell, and open listings.
An open listing allows the seller to work with multiple agents, with the commission going to the agent who brings in the buyer. This arrangement provides sellers with maximum flexibility, though it may also require more effort to manage multiple agents.
While net listings may seem attractive because they guarantee a certain amount of money for the seller, the potential downsides—such as leaving money on the table and creating conflicts of interest—often outweigh the benefits. Alternatives like exclusive right-to-sell or exclusive agency listings provide a more balanced and transparent approach, ensuring that the seller’s interests are protected while still allowing agents to earn a fair commission.
Pass Your Real Estate Exam with Ease!
Get 100 FREE practice questions and unlock an exclusive discount on our top-rated exam prep – your first step to passing with confidence!
In a net listing, the broker’s commission comes from the amount above the seller’s net price. The seller sets a minimum acceptable price they want to receive from the sale, and the broker keeps anything above that amount as commission.
A net listing is an agreement where the seller sets a minimum acceptable price and the agent keeps any amount above that price as commission. Unlike a traditional percentage-based commission, the broker’s compensation depends on how much the final sale price exceeds the seller’s required net amount.
The main negative aspect of a net listing is the conflict of interest it creates. Because the agent earns more by selling the property above the seller’s minimum price, an unethical agent may pressure the seller to accept a lower net price in order to increase the agent’s potential commission.
Net listings are a controversial and risky way to sell real estate. While they are legal in a few states, they are heavily regulated and generally discouraged due to the potential for abuse and conflicts of interest. Sellers and agents alike should be cautious when considering a net listing and explore safer, more transparent alternatives that protect all parties involved.
If you’re preparing for your real estate exam, net listings come up in listing agreement questions more often than you’d expect. Our real estate exam prep covers this and every other listing type, with practice questions, flashcards, and state-specific content. Start with Lexawise today.